Romney Caves Too

So Mitt Romney has told a total lie about "Senate precedent" to justify his dishonest, hypocritical intent to place another Trump appointed religious maniac on the Supreme Court.  


These are criminals, folks.  They are totally corrupt, and anyone who thought the miserable Romney, who built his fortune by destroying the jobs of literally tens of thousands of employees of companies that he looted, was any different, is a fool.


This pretty much leaves Lisa Murkowski.  Anybody with a shred of sense knows that the Republicans are going to have one Senator vote against their Supreme Court pick, just to prevent the Democrats from being able to call it a party line vote.  This is just what they did with Romney on the impeachment, and Murkowski seems to be the designated dissenter this time around.


That adds up to 52 Republican votes to further pollute the rule of law in this country, and very possibly engage in another grossly criminal outrage by placing Trump back in the White House, the way the corrupt Republican majority placed George W. Bush in the White House in 2000.  That's your Republican party, folks, and it will continue to be that until it is crushed out of existence.  There is no such thing as an honest Republican, and it's about time that Democrats admit that openly.  Naivete may be cute in little children, but it is nearly as bad as the crimes it ignores when it happens in government.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's Okay, Never Mind

Image
The woman in this picture, equipped with the weapons and ammunition shown, was found outside a National guard base. She is apparently a big Glenn Beck fan, and believed that the base was a FEMA concentration camp. Think she's the only one out there? You just know this sort of thing is not going to end well.
Read more

If a Tree Falls In the Woods

Image
 And nobody hears it, is it really running for President at all? First of all, a note about my absence lately:  My wife got me to sign up for an account at Threads, which is sort of like X without the assholes.  I've spent a little time establishing myself there, and I have to say, I do like the relatively immediate exchange of views, but I don't mean to give up my blog- there are still so many things that can't be dealt with in a couple hundred words, so, perhaps to your dismay, I am back. So, what motivated the above question is the fact that the Sunday New York Times today had seven articles about Trump, and absolutely zero about Kamala Harris.   The Republicans have a problem with Harris, in that virtually everyone who sees her likes her and immediately understands how qualified she is to be President.  They have tried mightily the last month to find some way to smear her, but have been spectacularly unsuccessful- the tactics of character assassination ...
Read more

Wingnuts Slightly Annoyed about that $83 Million

Image
How can you look like a decrepit old geezer and an out of control two year old at the same time? I thought it might be nice to look in on wingnut world to see how they are taking yesterday's $83 million dollar Trump legal loss.  You kind of know that they will decide it shouldn't affect their opinion of him in any way, but it might be helpful to see just how the Republican party has trained them to reject any fact they don't like.  Not that surprisingly, a lot of the usual wingnut suspects didn't touch this loss at all, preferring to just ignore anything that interferes with their hateful daydreams, but here are a few excerpts from an article at Gateway Pundit, along with a sample of the hundreds of comments it received.  Enjoy.  Or not. "Trump attorney Alina Habba WENT OFF after the crooked New York City court slapped President Trump with an $83 million judgment for speaking out against the disgusting lies of a crazed woman who said he lured her into a Bergdorf Go...
Read more