And nobody hears it, is it really running for President at all? First of all, a note about my absence lately: My wife got me to sign up for an account at Threads, which is sort of like X without the assholes. I've spent a little time establishing myself there, and I have to say, I do like the relatively immediate exchange of views, but I don't mean to give up my blog- there are still so many things that can't be dealt with in a couple hundred words, so, perhaps to your dismay, I am back. So, what motivated the above question is the fact that the Sunday New York Times today had seven articles about Trump, and absolutely zero about Kamala Harris. The Republicans have a problem with Harris, in that virtually everyone who sees her likes her and immediately understands how qualified she is to be President. They have tried mightily the last month to find some way to smear her, but have been spectacularly unsuccessful- the tactics of character assassination ...
Comments
Other than that, I'm hard pressed to think of much I agreed with Reagan on GE.
What's going on with you and Dr. Biobrain. Or is that a sore subject?
I was really pleased that he took the time to look at my blog, as I have always liked what he has to say.
I thought his reaction to my comment about Erick Erickson was a little strong. I have to admit that I don't really give a damn whether I am being 100% fair in reproducing the garbage that pours out of the right on a daily basis. That is because I absolutely do not take their comments as serious commentary, but rather as pathetic lies worthy of nothing but casual ridicule. I sift through a lot of their crap every day, and I know I am accurately representing their attitudes. Their mendacious drivel does not deserve any more, in my opinion. Still, if someone I respect, like Doctor Biobrain, feels I went over the line in this case, I'm willing to take him seriously.