Wrong

I found this picture on a blog called Stay a While, which is relatively new to me:















Well, I'm sorry to have to disagree with you, but that's exactly what it means around here.

Comments

(O)CT(O)PUS said…
Green Eagle,
A heads up: Tom from Stay Awhile is a very caring guy who is deeply concerned about the hyper-rhetoric that can incite violence at any moment (and he also has a terminal, inoperative brain cancer). This is his last chance to espouse his concerns.
April 16, 2010 at 7:16 PM
Poll P. said…
G.E., does it mean you couldn't 'care less'?
April 16, 2010 at 11:19 PM
Leslie Parsley said…
Tom has written much about the ugly rhetoric coming from the right. He is, as Octo says, a very caring man who has been dealt a raw deal. But you couldn't have known this since you're new to his blog. So, Stay Awhile.

I think what you're saying is it's a good thought but the right doesn't seem to get the message.
April 17, 2010 at 6:54 AM
Green Eagle said…
Hey, this wasn't intended to reflect on Tom at all- I like what he has to say. It was a joke about me, and my cheap-shot rhetoric, mainly motivated by the similarity of the picture to the parrot in my masthead. Please...it was about me, not Tom.
April 17, 2010 at 9:39 AM
(O)CT(O)PUS said…
Apologies, Green Eagle, my friend. The visual play was lost on me (what do sea creatures know about birds, anyhoo?)
April 17, 2010 at 3:59 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's Okay, Never Mind

Image
The woman in this picture, equipped with the weapons and ammunition shown, was found outside a National guard base. She is apparently a big Glenn Beck fan, and believed that the base was a FEMA concentration camp. Think she's the only one out there? You just know this sort of thing is not going to end well.
Read more

Wingnuts Slightly Annoyed about that $83 Million

Image
How can you look like a decrepit old geezer and an out of control two year old at the same time? I thought it might be nice to look in on wingnut world to see how they are taking yesterday's $83 million dollar Trump legal loss.  You kind of know that they will decide it shouldn't affect their opinion of him in any way, but it might be helpful to see just how the Republican party has trained them to reject any fact they don't like.  Not that surprisingly, a lot of the usual wingnut suspects didn't touch this loss at all, preferring to just ignore anything that interferes with their hateful daydreams, but here are a few excerpts from an article at Gateway Pundit, along with a sample of the hundreds of comments it received.  Enjoy.  Or not. "Trump attorney Alina Habba WENT OFF after the crooked New York City court slapped President Trump with an $83 million judgment for speaking out against the disgusting lies of a crazed woman who said he lured her into a Bergdorf Go
Read more

If a Tree Falls In the Woods

Image
 And nobody hears it, is it really running for President at all? First of all, a note about my absence lately:  My wife got me to sign up for an account at Threads, which is sort of like X without the assholes.  I've spent a little time establishing myself there, and I have to say, I do like the relatively immediate exchange of views, but I don't mean to give up my blog- there are still so many things that can't be dealt with in a couple hundred words, so, perhaps to your dismay, I am back. So, what motivated the above question is the fact that the Sunday New York Times today had seven articles about Trump, and absolutely zero about Kamala Harris.   The Republicans have a problem with Harris, in that virtually everyone who sees her likes her and immediately understands how qualified she is to be President.  They have tried mightily the last month to find some way to smear her, but have been spectacularly unsuccessful- the tactics of character assassination that worked so we
Read more