Pammy- Obama's Billions for Jihad
Little Pammy Geller, the Ovomit girl, is at it again, in a post entitled:
"Obama's Funding Bill: Billions for Jihad, Zero for Israel"
Now, let's leave apart the "nothing for Israel" part, which we know to be a lie, but is too contemptible to be worth mocking. Anyway, Pammy has a long list of the "Billions for Jiahd" part. Much too boring to repeat the whole list, but here are some of the items she mentions:
"$3.6 billion, matching the request, to expand and improve capabilities of the Afghan security forces
$400 million to build the counterinsurgency capabilities of the Pakistani security forces"
Pammy, I know your ability to string consistent thoughts together is rather limited, but I would think that even you would have noticed that this money is for fighting Jihad, and therefore cannot be said, strictly speaking, to be suppporting jihad. Perhaps that is a little too subtle for you to grasp, so please, think about it and get back to me on that one.
Next, Pammy has a whole list of Arab countries that are to receive money. This is, of course, all intended to be used for Jihad, because all Arabs are terrorists, right, Pammy, so what else could they do with the money?" Well, let's move on:
"Oversight: $20 million, $13 million above the request, to expand oversight capacity of the State Department, USAID, and the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan to review programs in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iraq."
God forbid Obama should spend money on oversight. What could possibly be more terrorist?
"International Food Assistance: $500 million
Refugee Assistance: $343 million
Disaster Assistance: $200 million
Global Financial Crisis: $300 million
Nuclear Non-Proliferation: $55 million"
Listen, I could go on here. There's more. But I guess you've got the point. Who in their right mind could ever believe that these things constitute funding jihad?
Oh wait a minute. Pam Geller- right mind. I see where I went wrong.
"Obama's Funding Bill: Billions for Jihad, Zero for Israel"
Now, let's leave apart the "nothing for Israel" part, which we know to be a lie, but is too contemptible to be worth mocking. Anyway, Pammy has a long list of the "Billions for Jiahd" part. Much too boring to repeat the whole list, but here are some of the items she mentions:
"$3.6 billion, matching the request, to expand and improve capabilities of the Afghan security forces
$400 million to build the counterinsurgency capabilities of the Pakistani security forces"
Pammy, I know your ability to string consistent thoughts together is rather limited, but I would think that even you would have noticed that this money is for fighting Jihad, and therefore cannot be said, strictly speaking, to be suppporting jihad. Perhaps that is a little too subtle for you to grasp, so please, think about it and get back to me on that one.
Next, Pammy has a whole list of Arab countries that are to receive money. This is, of course, all intended to be used for Jihad, because all Arabs are terrorists, right, Pammy, so what else could they do with the money?" Well, let's move on:
"Oversight: $20 million, $13 million above the request, to expand oversight capacity of the State Department, USAID, and the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan to review programs in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iraq."
God forbid Obama should spend money on oversight. What could possibly be more terrorist?
"International Food Assistance: $500 million
Refugee Assistance: $343 million
Disaster Assistance: $200 million
Global Financial Crisis: $300 million
Nuclear Non-Proliferation: $55 million"
Listen, I could go on here. There's more. But I guess you've got the point. Who in their right mind could ever believe that these things constitute funding jihad?
Oh wait a minute. Pam Geller- right mind. I see where I went wrong.
Comments