The GOP Strikes Back

I can't resist posting this picture of a Republican press conference this morning, which comes from AP, and I have already seen on a couple of other websites:














I guess people just don't really care that much about their belligerent posturing over the health care bill. Who could have ever thought that Americans would actually not rise up in fury, demanding vengeance because the Democrats gave them health insurance protection?

Comments

mastercynic said…
The media will play up the "outrage" (this morning I heard there were 30,000 protesters at the capital yesterday - I doubt if there were 300) and the right will ratchet up their fear-mongering lies until something else draws their attention... say and all out assault on Wall St. and the criminals who run the casino.
March 23, 2010 at 11:26 AM
Shaw Kenawe said…
Love it. This is what is real--not the overinflated noise and outrage that a few hundred people are hired to create.

Suppose they gave a press conference and nobody came?

LOL!
March 23, 2010 at 11:42 AM
Leslie Parsley said…
This is so delightful I posted it on my blog with a link to you and a strong recommendation that if people haven't visited here they're missing out.

After the past year we need as many smiles as we can get. I'm sure the GOP will claim the Dems bought off the leftist media.

Talk about being frozen out!
March 23, 2010 at 11:55 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's Okay, Never Mind

Image
The woman in this picture, equipped with the weapons and ammunition shown, was found outside a National guard base. She is apparently a big Glenn Beck fan, and believed that the base was a FEMA concentration camp. Think she's the only one out there? You just know this sort of thing is not going to end well.
Read more

If a Tree Falls In the Woods

Image
 And nobody hears it, is it really running for President at all? First of all, a note about my absence lately:  My wife got me to sign up for an account at Threads, which is sort of like X without the assholes.  I've spent a little time establishing myself there, and I have to say, I do like the relatively immediate exchange of views, but I don't mean to give up my blog- there are still so many things that can't be dealt with in a couple hundred words, so, perhaps to your dismay, I am back. So, what motivated the above question is the fact that the Sunday New York Times today had seven articles about Trump, and absolutely zero about Kamala Harris.   The Republicans have a problem with Harris, in that virtually everyone who sees her likes her and immediately understands how qualified she is to be President.  They have tried mightily the last month to find some way to smear her, but have been spectacularly unsuccessful- the tactics of character assassination ...
Read more

Wingnuts Slightly Annoyed about that $83 Million

Image
How can you look like a decrepit old geezer and an out of control two year old at the same time? I thought it might be nice to look in on wingnut world to see how they are taking yesterday's $83 million dollar Trump legal loss.  You kind of know that they will decide it shouldn't affect their opinion of him in any way, but it might be helpful to see just how the Republican party has trained them to reject any fact they don't like.  Not that surprisingly, a lot of the usual wingnut suspects didn't touch this loss at all, preferring to just ignore anything that interferes with their hateful daydreams, but here are a few excerpts from an article at Gateway Pundit, along with a sample of the hundreds of comments it received.  Enjoy.  Or not. "Trump attorney Alina Habba WENT OFF after the crooked New York City court slapped President Trump with an $83 million judgment for speaking out against the disgusting lies of a crazed woman who said he lured her into a Bergdorf Go...
Read more