McChrystal Canned

You read that right- Obama kicked the jerk out.

Luckily for our great democracy, conservatives have prepared their attacks on Obama both in the event that he fired McChrystal, and if he didn't. So, instead of a couple of weeks of Obama-the-Wimp, we can sit back and enjoy a couple of weeks of Obama-the Thug.

Politics is so easy when you do it the Republican way.

Comments

Shaw Kenawe said…
It's really hilarious to read the blogs on the right and see them actually siding with the general who broke his vows--the general who trashed the Constitution that the T-Pers so ardently clasp to their heaving bosoms and cry over, mewling that Mr. Obama is shredding it.

They stand for nothing except bashing any Democrat who is in the Oval Office.
June 23, 2010 at 11:49 AM
Poll P. said…
Couldn't agree more. I wanted to cheer when I heard he'd fired the b-tard. What about the vaunted fundamental rules of respect for the chain of command. How could the general have dissed his commander-in-chief, and expected to walk. I bet he was put up to it by right wingers.
June 23, 2010 at 12:50 PM
Derek Jordan Foley said…
Now we have General Patraeus, or as you call him, General Betray-Us.
June 23, 2010 at 12:52 PM
Green Eagle said…
Derek,

I don't call Petraeus that. I call him what Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Fallon called him: "an ass-kissing little chicken shit."
June 23, 2010 at 1:01 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's Okay, Never Mind

Image
The woman in this picture, equipped with the weapons and ammunition shown, was found outside a National guard base. She is apparently a big Glenn Beck fan, and believed that the base was a FEMA concentration camp. Think she's the only one out there? You just know this sort of thing is not going to end well.
Read more

If a Tree Falls In the Woods

Image
 And nobody hears it, is it really running for President at all? First of all, a note about my absence lately:  My wife got me to sign up for an account at Threads, which is sort of like X without the assholes.  I've spent a little time establishing myself there, and I have to say, I do like the relatively immediate exchange of views, but I don't mean to give up my blog- there are still so many things that can't be dealt with in a couple hundred words, so, perhaps to your dismay, I am back. So, what motivated the above question is the fact that the Sunday New York Times today had seven articles about Trump, and absolutely zero about Kamala Harris.   The Republicans have a problem with Harris, in that virtually everyone who sees her likes her and immediately understands how qualified she is to be President.  They have tried mightily the last month to find some way to smear her, but have been spectacularly unsuccessful- the tactics of character assassination ...
Read more

Wingnuts Slightly Annoyed about that $83 Million

Image
How can you look like a decrepit old geezer and an out of control two year old at the same time? I thought it might be nice to look in on wingnut world to see how they are taking yesterday's $83 million dollar Trump legal loss.  You kind of know that they will decide it shouldn't affect their opinion of him in any way, but it might be helpful to see just how the Republican party has trained them to reject any fact they don't like.  Not that surprisingly, a lot of the usual wingnut suspects didn't touch this loss at all, preferring to just ignore anything that interferes with their hateful daydreams, but here are a few excerpts from an article at Gateway Pundit, along with a sample of the hundreds of comments it received.  Enjoy.  Or not. "Trump attorney Alina Habba WENT OFF after the crooked New York City court slapped President Trump with an $83 million judgment for speaking out against the disgusting lies of a crazed woman who said he lured her into a Bergdorf Go...
Read more