Sean Hannity Calls In the Debt

Sean Hannity today:

"I say why isn’t Iraq paying us back with oil, and paying every American family and their soldiers that lost loved ones or have injured soldiers — and why didn’t they pay for their own liberation?"

Sean, I shouldn't have to remind you of this, but we didn't "liberate" them.  We invaded their country in an unprovoked war of aggression, killed a million of them, destroyed their infrastructure and left them in the hands of a bunch of sectarian religious fanatics.

How much do you think they owe us for that?

Comments

Jerry Critter said…
"...paying us back in oil..."

WTF?!? We were always told that this war was not about OIL? Never mind that the war was originally called Operation Iraqi Liberation (OIL)!
January 17, 2011 at 2:09 PM
Green Eagle said…
I thought OIL stood for Operation Idiots on the Loose.
January 17, 2011 at 3:52 PM
Anonymous said…
Hussein had them under control until we meddled.
January 17, 2011 at 6:12 PM
Dave Dubya said…
Then it would only be fair that we pay Iraq an equal amount of money for their dead, wounded and displaced, too, eh, Sean?

Oh, that's right. Their lives have no value.
January 18, 2011 at 9:01 AM
Green Eagle said…
In just think it's interesting that the people in Iraq had to live under a murderous, repressive dictator, and then we came in and made their lives worse. Ah, freedom, American style.
January 18, 2011 at 12:47 PM
Anonymous said…
yeah they missed the good old days.
January 19, 2011 at 9:39 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's Okay, Never Mind

Image
The woman in this picture, equipped with the weapons and ammunition shown, was found outside a National guard base. She is apparently a big Glenn Beck fan, and believed that the base was a FEMA concentration camp. Think she's the only one out there? You just know this sort of thing is not going to end well.
Read more

If a Tree Falls In the Woods

Image
 And nobody hears it, is it really running for President at all? First of all, a note about my absence lately:  My wife got me to sign up for an account at Threads, which is sort of like X without the assholes.  I've spent a little time establishing myself there, and I have to say, I do like the relatively immediate exchange of views, but I don't mean to give up my blog- there are still so many things that can't be dealt with in a couple hundred words, so, perhaps to your dismay, I am back. So, what motivated the above question is the fact that the Sunday New York Times today had seven articles about Trump, and absolutely zero about Kamala Harris.   The Republicans have a problem with Harris, in that virtually everyone who sees her likes her and immediately understands how qualified she is to be President.  They have tried mightily the last month to find some way to smear her, but have been spectacularly unsuccessful- the tactics of character assassination ...
Read more

Wingnuts Slightly Annoyed about that $83 Million

Image
How can you look like a decrepit old geezer and an out of control two year old at the same time? I thought it might be nice to look in on wingnut world to see how they are taking yesterday's $83 million dollar Trump legal loss.  You kind of know that they will decide it shouldn't affect their opinion of him in any way, but it might be helpful to see just how the Republican party has trained them to reject any fact they don't like.  Not that surprisingly, a lot of the usual wingnut suspects didn't touch this loss at all, preferring to just ignore anything that interferes with their hateful daydreams, but here are a few excerpts from an article at Gateway Pundit, along with a sample of the hundreds of comments it received.  Enjoy.  Or not. "Trump attorney Alina Habba WENT OFF after the crooked New York City court slapped President Trump with an $83 million judgment for speaking out against the disgusting lies of a crazed woman who said he lured her into a Bergdorf Go...
Read more