Halliburton Revenues Down, So Sad

This just in:

"HOUSTON—Halliburton Co. said Monday that...fourth-quarter earnings fell 48% as revenue weakened."

What a difference it makes when you don't have your corrupt CEO sitting in the vice president's chair, steering billions in no-bid contracts your way.

Comments

(O)CT(O)PUS said…
As I was reading your post, suddenly I realized: A raw onion had caused my eyes to well up.
January 26, 2010 at 2:55 PM
Green Eagle said…
Love the new spelling of your name. I hope it wasn't just because those tears made it too hard to see the keyboard.

Anyway, into everyone's life a little rain must fall- even those people who bought Halliburton stock thinking their profits the last eight years were due to exemplary performance.
January 26, 2010 at 4:58 PM
(O)CT(O)PUS said…
Rhymes with Tschüß and sauerpüß.
January 26, 2010 at 7:59 PM
Grung_e_Gene said…
Halliburton is now full of Strays Don't Feed 'em any more free money from American Tax Payers make them whore themselves out to Saudi Arabia, like their benefactor Dick Cheney and Bush whored out the US military to SA....
January 26, 2010 at 9:55 PM
Green Eagle said…
Gene,

Sad to say, even if we stomped them into the ground like the worms they are, there would be a thousand more greedy savages standing in line to take their place. Two things our country has no shortage of is morally bankrupt rich people and their lackeys.
January 27, 2010 at 12:07 AM
Derek said…
Checchi & Company Consulting, Inc. profits up.
January 27, 2010 at 7:11 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's Okay, Never Mind

Image
The woman in this picture, equipped with the weapons and ammunition shown, was found outside a National guard base. She is apparently a big Glenn Beck fan, and believed that the base was a FEMA concentration camp. Think she's the only one out there? You just know this sort of thing is not going to end well.
Read more

If a Tree Falls In the Woods

Image
 And nobody hears it, is it really running for President at all? First of all, a note about my absence lately:  My wife got me to sign up for an account at Threads, which is sort of like X without the assholes.  I've spent a little time establishing myself there, and I have to say, I do like the relatively immediate exchange of views, but I don't mean to give up my blog- there are still so many things that can't be dealt with in a couple hundred words, so, perhaps to your dismay, I am back. So, what motivated the above question is the fact that the Sunday New York Times today had seven articles about Trump, and absolutely zero about Kamala Harris.   The Republicans have a problem with Harris, in that virtually everyone who sees her likes her and immediately understands how qualified she is to be President.  They have tried mightily the last month to find some way to smear her, but have been spectacularly unsuccessful- the tactics of character assassination ...
Read more

Wingnuts Slightly Annoyed about that $83 Million

Image
How can you look like a decrepit old geezer and an out of control two year old at the same time? I thought it might be nice to look in on wingnut world to see how they are taking yesterday's $83 million dollar Trump legal loss.  You kind of know that they will decide it shouldn't affect their opinion of him in any way, but it might be helpful to see just how the Republican party has trained them to reject any fact they don't like.  Not that surprisingly, a lot of the usual wingnut suspects didn't touch this loss at all, preferring to just ignore anything that interferes with their hateful daydreams, but here are a few excerpts from an article at Gateway Pundit, along with a sample of the hundreds of comments it received.  Enjoy.  Or not. "Trump attorney Alina Habba WENT OFF after the crooked New York City court slapped President Trump with an $83 million judgment for speaking out against the disgusting lies of a crazed woman who said he lured her into a Bergdorf Go...
Read more