An Interesting Comparison

This is a chart that was at Daily Kos today:











It charts  U.S. economic growth in the last couple of years.  The white part was under Republicans and the blue part was under Democrats.

I think it would be interesting to take a look at it and keep it in mind when you read the post below about Roosevelt.  Some things never change.

Comments

Silverfiddle said…
This is what happens when you hit the bottom of a recession, the economy starts growing again.

Obama owns the record for the slowest growth ever after a recession (maybe FDR was worse, I don't have the data handy)

http://blog.heritage.org/2010/10/13/reagan-recovery-vs-obama-recovery-in-pictures/

You want to defend this Obama recovery? Tell it to the millions that are still out of work.
October 30, 2010 at 6:05 AM
Shaw Kenawe said…
SF is at it again. Turning truths into lies.

He's a Gooper, afterall, isn't he.
October 30, 2010 at 2:03 PM
Jean Valjean said…
I forget the part where Obama sent millions of good jobs out of the U.S., to places where labor is cheaper, environmental rules are laxer, and governments can be bought and sold. All part of the Democrats scheme to reduce the U.S. electorate to mental deficients, and the U.S. economy to Third-World status.What year of Obama's presidency was that?
October 30, 2010 at 7:37 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's Okay, Never Mind

Image
The woman in this picture, equipped with the weapons and ammunition shown, was found outside a National guard base. She is apparently a big Glenn Beck fan, and believed that the base was a FEMA concentration camp. Think she's the only one out there? You just know this sort of thing is not going to end well.
Read more

If a Tree Falls In the Woods

Image
 And nobody hears it, is it really running for President at all? First of all, a note about my absence lately:  My wife got me to sign up for an account at Threads, which is sort of like X without the assholes.  I've spent a little time establishing myself there, and I have to say, I do like the relatively immediate exchange of views, but I don't mean to give up my blog- there are still so many things that can't be dealt with in a couple hundred words, so, perhaps to your dismay, I am back. So, what motivated the above question is the fact that the Sunday New York Times today had seven articles about Trump, and absolutely zero about Kamala Harris.   The Republicans have a problem with Harris, in that virtually everyone who sees her likes her and immediately understands how qualified she is to be President.  They have tried mightily the last month to find some way to smear her, but have been spectacularly unsuccessful- the tactics of character assassination ...
Read more

Wingnuts Slightly Annoyed about that $83 Million

Image
How can you look like a decrepit old geezer and an out of control two year old at the same time? I thought it might be nice to look in on wingnut world to see how they are taking yesterday's $83 million dollar Trump legal loss.  You kind of know that they will decide it shouldn't affect their opinion of him in any way, but it might be helpful to see just how the Republican party has trained them to reject any fact they don't like.  Not that surprisingly, a lot of the usual wingnut suspects didn't touch this loss at all, preferring to just ignore anything that interferes with their hateful daydreams, but here are a few excerpts from an article at Gateway Pundit, along with a sample of the hundreds of comments it received.  Enjoy.  Or not. "Trump attorney Alina Habba WENT OFF after the crooked New York City court slapped President Trump with an $83 million judgment for speaking out against the disgusting lies of a crazed woman who said he lured her into a Bergdorf Go...
Read more