Were We At The Same Place?

Varying responses to Mitt Romney's speech yesterday to the NAACP:

Talking Points Memo:  "NAACP Crowd Boos Romney’s Promise To Repeal ‘Obamacare’"

Crooks & Liars:  "Mitt Romney Loudly Booed at NAACP"

Little Green Footballs:  "Mitt Romney parroted his standard right wing positions to the NAACP convention today...and was booed by the audience several times."

And from the right:

Town Hall:  "Romney Receives Standing Ovation for Straight Talk at NAACP Convention "

Man...you just can't slow them down once they get on a roll.

Comments

Poll P. said…
They've ensured that for most of us, "truth" is what they say it is.
July 11, 2012 at 3:11 PM
Magpie said…
There are those on the Right that think it was a good thing he was booed by the NAACP… so well might we ask: “which is it”?

Sad stack of rubbish, TownHall.
July 12, 2012 at 3:50 AM
Anonymous said…
haha where was Obama? Talk about arrogance. He knows he's got their vote so why should he even bother going?
I don't think it was good he got booed,but he said what he wanted to do without the lies that Obama does to appease.
July 12, 2012 at 7:47 AM
Anonymous said…
for those of you who believe in science
July 12, 2012 at 8:06 AM
Green Eagle said…
They would have named an organism after Romney, but cockroaches already had a name.
July 12, 2012 at 2:05 PM
mastercynic said…
They did name an organism after Mitt: pond scum.
July 13, 2012 at 1:21 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's Okay, Never Mind

Image
The woman in this picture, equipped with the weapons and ammunition shown, was found outside a National guard base. She is apparently a big Glenn Beck fan, and believed that the base was a FEMA concentration camp. Think she's the only one out there? You just know this sort of thing is not going to end well.
Read more

Wingnuts Slightly Annoyed about that $83 Million

Image
How can you look like a decrepit old geezer and an out of control two year old at the same time? I thought it might be nice to look in on wingnut world to see how they are taking yesterday's $83 million dollar Trump legal loss.  You kind of know that they will decide it shouldn't affect their opinion of him in any way, but it might be helpful to see just how the Republican party has trained them to reject any fact they don't like.  Not that surprisingly, a lot of the usual wingnut suspects didn't touch this loss at all, preferring to just ignore anything that interferes with their hateful daydreams, but here are a few excerpts from an article at Gateway Pundit, along with a sample of the hundreds of comments it received.  Enjoy.  Or not. "Trump attorney Alina Habba WENT OFF after the crooked New York City court slapped President Trump with an $83 million judgment for speaking out against the disgusting lies of a crazed woman who said he lured her into a Bergdorf Go
Read more

If a Tree Falls In the Woods

Image
 And nobody hears it, is it really running for President at all? First of all, a note about my absence lately:  My wife got me to sign up for an account at Threads, which is sort of like X without the assholes.  I've spent a little time establishing myself there, and I have to say, I do like the relatively immediate exchange of views, but I don't mean to give up my blog- there are still so many things that can't be dealt with in a couple hundred words, so, perhaps to your dismay, I am back. So, what motivated the above question is the fact that the Sunday New York Times today had seven articles about Trump, and absolutely zero about Kamala Harris.   The Republicans have a problem with Harris, in that virtually everyone who sees her likes her and immediately understands how qualified she is to be President.  They have tried mightily the last month to find some way to smear her, but have been spectacularly unsuccessful- the tactics of character assassination that worked so we
Read more