Green Eagle Can't Resist a Cheap Shot

Courtesy of Crooks and Liars, here's a typical Conservative candidate, a guy who claims to be named Richard Sheridan, speaking to a reporter that dared to question his rabid gaybaiting:



But is this really a guy named Richard Sheridan, or is he not in fact this occasional visitor here at Green Eagle:




And bonus points for answering the following question:  Which did you find more interesting, the guy's rant or the turkeys in the background?  Inquiring minds want to know.

Comments

the yellow fringe said…
I don't think it's the same guy. The mustache is not trimmed identical, more wrinkles on the bible thumper including one where his nose meets forehead, but, voices are close, speech pattern not so sure of, maybe. Turkeys, well, they won't start any wars in the name of god or scream at gays, that's a good thing.
May 15, 2013 at 3:27 PM
Poll P. said…
Turkeys, for sure!
May 15, 2013 at 4:03 PM
Anonymous said…
I know many conservatives and none of them are whacky like this guy just like there are some whacky Obama supporters you don't know

classyhuh?
May 16, 2013 at 8:17 AM
Anonymous said…
typical Obama voter
May 16, 2013 at 8:22 AM
Anonymous said…
check ut this racist Tea Party Bigot
May 16, 2013 at 9:15 AM
curt said…
Seriously that guy had a very sick mother. He wears her shadow.
May 16, 2013 at 11:31 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's Okay, Never Mind

Image
The woman in this picture, equipped with the weapons and ammunition shown, was found outside a National guard base. She is apparently a big Glenn Beck fan, and believed that the base was a FEMA concentration camp. Think she's the only one out there? You just know this sort of thing is not going to end well.
Read more

If a Tree Falls In the Woods

Image
 And nobody hears it, is it really running for President at all? First of all, a note about my absence lately:  My wife got me to sign up for an account at Threads, which is sort of like X without the assholes.  I've spent a little time establishing myself there, and I have to say, I do like the relatively immediate exchange of views, but I don't mean to give up my blog- there are still so many things that can't be dealt with in a couple hundred words, so, perhaps to your dismay, I am back. So, what motivated the above question is the fact that the Sunday New York Times today had seven articles about Trump, and absolutely zero about Kamala Harris.   The Republicans have a problem with Harris, in that virtually everyone who sees her likes her and immediately understands how qualified she is to be President.  They have tried mightily the last month to find some way to smear her, but have been spectacularly unsuccessful- the tactics of character assassination ...
Read more

Wingnuts Slightly Annoyed about that $83 Million

Image
How can you look like a decrepit old geezer and an out of control two year old at the same time? I thought it might be nice to look in on wingnut world to see how they are taking yesterday's $83 million dollar Trump legal loss.  You kind of know that they will decide it shouldn't affect their opinion of him in any way, but it might be helpful to see just how the Republican party has trained them to reject any fact they don't like.  Not that surprisingly, a lot of the usual wingnut suspects didn't touch this loss at all, preferring to just ignore anything that interferes with their hateful daydreams, but here are a few excerpts from an article at Gateway Pundit, along with a sample of the hundreds of comments it received.  Enjoy.  Or not. "Trump attorney Alina Habba WENT OFF after the crooked New York City court slapped President Trump with an $83 million judgment for speaking out against the disgusting lies of a crazed woman who said he lured her into a Bergdorf Go...
Read more