FORGOTTEN HEROES OF CONSERVATISM Chapter 1- Westbrook Pegler

"My hates have always occupied my mind much more actively and have given greater spiritual satisfactions than my friendships."- Westbrook Pegler

This post is intended to be the first in a short series covering the careers of several twentieth century Conservative opinion leaders.  I am writing this because of the dangerous notion that the miserable state of the Republican party today is the product of the cleverness of Donald Trump, or of the current generation of Republican leaders, such as Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell, or even of recent Republican demagogues like Newt Gingrich or Ronald Reagan.  In fact the miserable excuse for an ideology that defines modern Conservatism has been building for at least a century in this country, and at this point cannot be rooted out without destroying the Republican party and its leaders.

My choice for the first article is one Westbrook Pegler, who was the first columnist in the country to win the Pulitzer prize, and was a massively influential character from the 1930's until his mental dissolution and degeneration into pure anti-Semitic hatred in the 1960's.
Westbrook Pegler

Pegler was born in 1894.  His father was a semi-successful reporter.  He was the youngest American war correspondent during World War I.  After the war, he was initially employed as a sports writer but within a few years had transformed into a political reporter and then a columnist.  Initially a fan of FDR, he quickly morphed during the New deal, like such other figures as Father Charles Coughlin, into an anti-Democrat hate spewer. As described by Diane McWhorter in a 2004 Slate article:

"At his peak in the 1930s and 1940s, Pegler was a leading popularizer of one of the most concerted antidemocratic crusades in this country's history: the vicious backlash against the New Deal and the labor movement to which it gave legal protection. This anti-Roosevelt front included the country's major industrialists, anti-Semitic, red-baiting pamphleteers, Congressman Martin Dies' Committee on Un-American Activities, and an assortment of Depression-era demagogues (and men...who conspired with Hitler's agents in this country)...he quickly became a shrill cheerleader for the right's campaign to paint the New Deal's democratic advances as an internationalist Communist plot."


Of course, this is nothing but an early version of exactly the line pushed by Republicans today.


As his Wikipedia page says:

"In the 1950s and 1960s, as Pegler's conservative views became more extreme and his writing increasingly shrill, he earned the tag of "the stuck whistle of journalism."  He denounced the civil rights movement and in the early 1960s wrote for the John Birch Society, until he was invited to leave because of his extreme views. (note: mainly extreme anti-Semitism.)"



 A cartoon showing Pegler rooting out union corruption.  It was catching a crooked union leader that initially led to his widespread popularity, but this rapidly morphed into a virulent hatred of unions which has typified Republican thought ever since.

By the fifties, this had reached the point that Pegler openly stated:

"clearly the bounden duty of all intelligent Americans to proclaim and practice bigotry"; his embrace of the label racist, "a common but false synonym for Nazi, used by the bigots of New York"; or his habit of calling Jews "geese," because they hiss when they talk, gulp down everything before them, and foul everything in their wake."

This sort of talk was not enough, however, to prevent the leading Conservative "intellectual" of the era, the still revered William F. Buckley, from championing Pegler and his views.

To quote one more article, by J. C. Sharlet, in the Baffler, from 1999

"Pegler didn’t seem to have any politics; all he had was rage.  From the Depression through the Cold War, he tilted at suspects familiar to Rush Limbaugh’s fans: foreign subversives, swindling politicians, the First Lady, corrupt union bosses, the elite, the effete, and, of course, homosexuals. 

Pegler carried on his campaigns in the name of one particular “little guy” known as George Spelvin, American.  Pegler’s Spelvin...was an early Archie Bunker. Union men, uppity women, swells, bubbleheads, and eventually foreigners, blacks, and Jews all gave Spelvin a stomachache."



A brief bit of film of Pegler


The same enemies, and the same overwhelming rage, subsuming all reason, as we see today from Republicans. I will deal with several more such characters in future parts of this series, but even in the person of this one popular character can be seen everything (except possibly the open, sneering corruption) that characterizes the current Republican party.  That is why it is so important to understand that destroying Trump, or taking back Congress and ridding ourselves of the miserable Republican leadership that currently calls the shots in our country, as desirable as that would be, will not address a problem that has been the deliberate creation of a century's evil work.  The Republican party itself, in its totality, is an invasive and deadly intrusion into our country, that has been at work for a century to destroy us, and it is only in its eradication that we can hope to find salvation.

Comments

Magpie said…
That's interesting. I thought I had not heard of him before, but I recognised a quote of his regarding RFK:
"Some white patriot of the Southern tier will spatter his spoonful of brains in public premises before the snow flies"

Which is a disgusting thing to say, now as then.
They will always be among us. . . Unfortunately, the existence of Barack Obama - and now Trump - has brought a lot more of them out from under their rocks than we have seen for many years. . . It is one thing for Right Wing funded "hack intellectuals" to trade their fantasies among themselves in think tanks - another for Old Confederacy white voters to vote against their own economic interests so long as "the man" signals they are still above the "you know whos" - but for Trump to carry states like Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania simply means Democrats must run better candidates - Obama carried those 3 states because he was not viewed as an elite who cared more for East Coast elites than working people (which both Clintons are now viewed as - based upon what Bill Clinton did in office!)
Green Eagle said…
You are suggesting that Democrats pander to the monster that Republicans have created. This is wrong. It is wrong because it is evil, and if Democrats do Republicans the favor of descending to their level, there will be no reason to choose them over a party with so much more experience at being evil. We must stop evil, not join it.
Anonymous said…
http://westbrookpegler.blogspot.com

Popular posts from this blog

It's Okay, Never Mind

Wingnuts Slightly Annoyed about that $83 Million

If a Tree Falls In the Woods