Some Good Electoral News

From Public Policy Polling:

"We've found a lot of brutal poll numbers for Sarah Palin so far in 2011: down in South Dakota, down in South Carolina, down in Arizona, only up by 1 point in Texas, only up by 1 point in Nebraska to name a few. But this has to be the worst- independent voters say they would support Charlie Sheen over Palin for President by a 41/36 margin. Seriously

...Sheen is one of the most unpopular figures we've ever polled on."

But not as unpopular as the good ol' Quitta from Wasilla.

Hope you got a laugh out of that.  We don't get much good news these days.

Comments

Shaw Kenawe said…
I made a bet with a friend that Palin would self destruct within a couple of years.

After the 2008 election, she had the momentum and dedicated followers that would have carried her forward to be the nominee for the GOP in 2012, but she didn't have the lacks self-discipline and the ability to know what she doesn't know. Essentially, she's a beauty queen contestant who got lucky in politics in a sparsely populated state.

I'm glad her 15 minutes are finally over.
March 17, 2011 at 3:01 PM
mastercynic said…
And Republicans would vote for Sheen over Obama - so what? The question is will the American people support the fascist wave of "tea party" government sweeping the state houses of Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio and others? So far they haven't managed to curb the results of voting against their own self-interests in the last election.

WE GET THE GOVERNMENT WE DESERVE!
March 18, 2011 at 8:49 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's Okay, Never Mind

Image
The woman in this picture, equipped with the weapons and ammunition shown, was found outside a National guard base. She is apparently a big Glenn Beck fan, and believed that the base was a FEMA concentration camp. Think she's the only one out there? You just know this sort of thing is not going to end well.
Read more

If a Tree Falls In the Woods

Image
 And nobody hears it, is it really running for President at all? First of all, a note about my absence lately:  My wife got me to sign up for an account at Threads, which is sort of like X without the assholes.  I've spent a little time establishing myself there, and I have to say, I do like the relatively immediate exchange of views, but I don't mean to give up my blog- there are still so many things that can't be dealt with in a couple hundred words, so, perhaps to your dismay, I am back. So, what motivated the above question is the fact that the Sunday New York Times today had seven articles about Trump, and absolutely zero about Kamala Harris.   The Republicans have a problem with Harris, in that virtually everyone who sees her likes her and immediately understands how qualified she is to be President.  They have tried mightily the last month to find some way to smear her, but have been spectacularly unsuccessful- the tactics of character assassination ...
Read more

Wingnuts Slightly Annoyed about that $83 Million

Image
How can you look like a decrepit old geezer and an out of control two year old at the same time? I thought it might be nice to look in on wingnut world to see how they are taking yesterday's $83 million dollar Trump legal loss.  You kind of know that they will decide it shouldn't affect their opinion of him in any way, but it might be helpful to see just how the Republican party has trained them to reject any fact they don't like.  Not that surprisingly, a lot of the usual wingnut suspects didn't touch this loss at all, preferring to just ignore anything that interferes with their hateful daydreams, but here are a few excerpts from an article at Gateway Pundit, along with a sample of the hundreds of comments it received.  Enjoy.  Or not. "Trump attorney Alina Habba WENT OFF after the crooked New York City court slapped President Trump with an $83 million judgment for speaking out against the disgusting lies of a crazed woman who said he lured her into a Bergdorf Go...
Read more