Another Sovereign Citizen Acts as Expected

From the Tampa Bay Times, this edifying story:

"A man was arrested in Pasco County on charges he held a woman against her will for more than three months after she came from Texas to study a group he founded that purports to help reunite children with their parents...

Davis, 48, is a sovereign citizen"

But of course he is.  In case you were wondering, here he is:
 As you know, I like to keep an eye on Sovereign Citizens, as their many acts of violence in the last couple of decades marks them as a pool of very dangerous right wing maniacs.  Well, I've kept my eye on this one long enough.  Judging from his picture, he is just about as short of a functional brain as most of these people are.  Well, at least this one will be in prison for the duration of the Trump administration.

A spokesman for the group had this to say:  "(Group member Thomas) Nelson said members of the group don't call themselves sovereign citizens because they disagree with the term, believing a person can't be both sovereign and a citizen at the same time.

"What we reject are statutes, codes and ordinances," Nelson said."

Statutes, codes and ordinances.  That's all they reject.  You got a problem with that?  After all, they are still fine with orders given at the point of a gun- as long as they have the guns and are giving the orders.

Comments

Magpie said…
Sovereign citizenship is the equivalent of believing in Santa instead of your parents and taking the real gifts regardless.

There are a number of genuinely stateless people in the world. Short of imminent threat of death I cannot imagine a more scary situation.

If you desire the convenience of not being precisely where everything is exploding, burning, sinking, starving or dying... citizenship of somewhere nicer is all that can save you and it's strictly a package deal.
November 29, 2016 at 2:25 AM
Zosimus the Heathen said…
Sadly this sickness seems to be spreading outside the US, if one of our own examples of this insanity is anything to go by. Apparently, there's a fairly infamous Australian sovereign citizen called Peter Andrew Nolan (who punctuates his name in a bizarre fashion, as I believe these folk are wont to do, and insists that anyone who uses it pays him an ounce of gold (or somesuch nonsense) for the privilege of doing so). Among other charming things, he's apparently a wife beater and Holocaust denier (probably nothing unusual for a sovereign citizen nutjob), who's so loopy he's been banned from various "men's rights" sites, message boards, and blogs, whose creators/moderators consider him too crazy, even for them! The last I heard, he's bouncing around Europe, doing his best to stay one step ahead of various countries' respective law enforcement bodies. Lovely fellow.
November 30, 2016 at 12:58 AM
Green Eagle said…
As is usual with right wingers, "Sovereign" means mainly not having to pay taxes, with a side helping of ignoring any law they don't like. If you follow these people, you would think they are as loony a bunch of clowns as you will ever encounter, except that they are the source of constant violence around the country. This is only one example.
November 30, 2016 at 2:27 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's Okay, Never Mind

Image
The woman in this picture, equipped with the weapons and ammunition shown, was found outside a National guard base. She is apparently a big Glenn Beck fan, and believed that the base was a FEMA concentration camp. Think she's the only one out there? You just know this sort of thing is not going to end well.
Read more

If a Tree Falls In the Woods

Image
 And nobody hears it, is it really running for President at all? First of all, a note about my absence lately:  My wife got me to sign up for an account at Threads, which is sort of like X without the assholes.  I've spent a little time establishing myself there, and I have to say, I do like the relatively immediate exchange of views, but I don't mean to give up my blog- there are still so many things that can't be dealt with in a couple hundred words, so, perhaps to your dismay, I am back. So, what motivated the above question is the fact that the Sunday New York Times today had seven articles about Trump, and absolutely zero about Kamala Harris.   The Republicans have a problem with Harris, in that virtually everyone who sees her likes her and immediately understands how qualified she is to be President.  They have tried mightily the last month to find some way to smear her, but have been spectacularly unsuccessful- the tactics of character assassination ...
Read more

Wingnuts Slightly Annoyed about that $83 Million

Image
How can you look like a decrepit old geezer and an out of control two year old at the same time? I thought it might be nice to look in on wingnut world to see how they are taking yesterday's $83 million dollar Trump legal loss.  You kind of know that they will decide it shouldn't affect their opinion of him in any way, but it might be helpful to see just how the Republican party has trained them to reject any fact they don't like.  Not that surprisingly, a lot of the usual wingnut suspects didn't touch this loss at all, preferring to just ignore anything that interferes with their hateful daydreams, but here are a few excerpts from an article at Gateway Pundit, along with a sample of the hundreds of comments it received.  Enjoy.  Or not. "Trump attorney Alina Habba WENT OFF after the crooked New York City court slapped President Trump with an $83 million judgment for speaking out against the disgusting lies of a crazed woman who said he lured her into a Bergdorf Go...
Read more