Thomas Talks!

It's only been a couple of weeks since Antonin Scalia kicked the bucket, and today,

Clarence Thomas Asked Questions from the Supreme Court Bench!!!

 Thomas has not asked a question from the bench in over ten years.

Things we will never know:  What did Big Nino have to hold over Thomas, to keep him silent for ten years?  Was one Supreme Court Justice being blackmailed by another one?

What a question, huh, and what a sad state when we even have to ask it.

Comments

Adam Alabaster, A-1 American said…
It is a sad state. Such a question suggests that the person asking it is paranoid and into conspiracy theories.
February 29, 2016 at 8:14 PM
Green Eagle said…
Well, Adam, I think it is fair of you to suggest that. I just think that it is awfully strange that Thomas was silent for so long, and then, almost immediately after Scalia's death, he starts asking questions. Do you have a better explanation for this phenomenon? My wife thinks that the same people who told him all along to shut up and let Nino do the talking, have now told him that he has to step up and push their corrupt, anti-democratic agenda, now that Nino is gone, or they will cut off Ginny's bribes. That's probably the real explanation.
March 1, 2016 at 9:33 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's Okay, Never Mind

Image
The woman in this picture, equipped with the weapons and ammunition shown, was found outside a National guard base. She is apparently a big Glenn Beck fan, and believed that the base was a FEMA concentration camp. Think she's the only one out there? You just know this sort of thing is not going to end well.
Read more

If a Tree Falls In the Woods

Image
 And nobody hears it, is it really running for President at all? First of all, a note about my absence lately:  My wife got me to sign up for an account at Threads, which is sort of like X without the assholes.  I've spent a little time establishing myself there, and I have to say, I do like the relatively immediate exchange of views, but I don't mean to give up my blog- there are still so many things that can't be dealt with in a couple hundred words, so, perhaps to your dismay, I am back. So, what motivated the above question is the fact that the Sunday New York Times today had seven articles about Trump, and absolutely zero about Kamala Harris.   The Republicans have a problem with Harris, in that virtually everyone who sees her likes her and immediately understands how qualified she is to be President.  They have tried mightily the last month to find some way to smear her, but have been spectacularly unsuccessful- the tactics of character assassination ...
Read more

Wingnuts Slightly Annoyed about that $83 Million

Image
How can you look like a decrepit old geezer and an out of control two year old at the same time? I thought it might be nice to look in on wingnut world to see how they are taking yesterday's $83 million dollar Trump legal loss.  You kind of know that they will decide it shouldn't affect their opinion of him in any way, but it might be helpful to see just how the Republican party has trained them to reject any fact they don't like.  Not that surprisingly, a lot of the usual wingnut suspects didn't touch this loss at all, preferring to just ignore anything that interferes with their hateful daydreams, but here are a few excerpts from an article at Gateway Pundit, along with a sample of the hundreds of comments it received.  Enjoy.  Or not. "Trump attorney Alina Habba WENT OFF after the crooked New York City court slapped President Trump with an $83 million judgment for speaking out against the disgusting lies of a crazed woman who said he lured her into a Bergdorf Go...
Read more