Global Warming- "Teach the Controversy"

Oh yes, to listen to the idiots on the right and most of the mainstream press, there is tremendous scientific controversy about the reality of man made global warming.  Well, here, thanks to what I am sure was a very painful slog through all 13,950 (!) peer reviewed scientific papers on the subject that were published between 1991 and 2012, is a wonderful graphic presentation of that "controversy."

Yes, a grand total of one sixth of one percent of the papers questioned the facts on global warming.  If the recent Presidential election had been that lopsided, Mitt Romney would have gotten about 204,000 votes out of 120 million cast.  Which, in fact, is about what he would have gotten, if the mainstream press told the truth about the lies Republicans tell about subjects like global warming, and the price we will all have to pay if this pandering to energy companies isn't stopped.

Thanks to Desmog Blog, and James Lawrence Powell for carrying out a difficult task that wouldn't even be necessary in a country run by decent people.

Comments

the yellow fringe said…
It is amazing that deniers pretend that scientist from all over the world, from nations that don't get along, from scientist in different fields, that this group of people trained not to believe things until it can be proven, would be able to perpetuate for years such a complex hoax. In our extended family is a physicist working for NASA on global warming specifically on ice melt, permafrost and peat fires. HIs office in NYC. They were hectored so much the sign was taken off the building, and they had to put a guard in the lobby to keep out threatening dingbats. Science is under attack and the crazies are egged on by business and reichwing media.
November 26, 2012 at 10:56 AM
the yellow fringe said…
Only 24 papers have ever been published that show some aspect of global warming observation does not agree with the wider trend. Focused on a particular event or data set, 24 were found to be valid. But please know that none unravel the findings of the 13,950 other findings. For if one did, the GOP, Massey, BP, & Kochs would have had it printed and mailed to every house in the nation. The sceptics claim thousands of papers published, what they do is write articles for small town papers, for "for profit" magazines, on blogs, for right wing media, and more and more for the mainstream media who have no one and no interest in vetting these pieces as they lay off and dumb down reporting staff. These articles don't stand up, are often written by people uneducated in the field, rely on doubt and reuse false info off the internet. No review is needed, no facts, just get us something for December.
November 26, 2012 at 11:28 AM
Grung_e_Gene said…
Actually, GE, the controversy is between,

God did it.

and

Satan did it.

No need for further inquiry...
November 26, 2012 at 2:28 PM
Green Eagle said…
Satan comes from where it is really hot, as I've been told, so I guess it must have been him.
November 26, 2012 at 11:41 PM
BB-Idaho said…
These contrived controversies must be the stock in trade of FoxNews:
..like the Benghazi 'scandal'...
November 28, 2012 at 1:30 PM
Green Eagle said…
BB, it's all they have. Don't you think the right has spent untold man-hours and God knows how much money trying to find some real thing that Obama did wrong? They can't so they resort to their endless series of phony scandals confident (quite correctly, I'm afraid) that every one of them convinces some people.
November 30, 2012 at 1:04 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's Okay, Never Mind

Image
The woman in this picture, equipped with the weapons and ammunition shown, was found outside a National guard base. She is apparently a big Glenn Beck fan, and believed that the base was a FEMA concentration camp. Think she's the only one out there? You just know this sort of thing is not going to end well.
Read more

If a Tree Falls In the Woods

Image
 And nobody hears it, is it really running for President at all? First of all, a note about my absence lately:  My wife got me to sign up for an account at Threads, which is sort of like X without the assholes.  I've spent a little time establishing myself there, and I have to say, I do like the relatively immediate exchange of views, but I don't mean to give up my blog- there are still so many things that can't be dealt with in a couple hundred words, so, perhaps to your dismay, I am back. So, what motivated the above question is the fact that the Sunday New York Times today had seven articles about Trump, and absolutely zero about Kamala Harris.   The Republicans have a problem with Harris, in that virtually everyone who sees her likes her and immediately understands how qualified she is to be President.  They have tried mightily the last month to find some way to smear her, but have been spectacularly unsuccessful- the tactics of character assassination ...
Read more

Wingnuts Slightly Annoyed about that $83 Million

Image
How can you look like a decrepit old geezer and an out of control two year old at the same time? I thought it might be nice to look in on wingnut world to see how they are taking yesterday's $83 million dollar Trump legal loss.  You kind of know that they will decide it shouldn't affect their opinion of him in any way, but it might be helpful to see just how the Republican party has trained them to reject any fact they don't like.  Not that surprisingly, a lot of the usual wingnut suspects didn't touch this loss at all, preferring to just ignore anything that interferes with their hateful daydreams, but here are a few excerpts from an article at Gateway Pundit, along with a sample of the hundreds of comments it received.  Enjoy.  Or not. "Trump attorney Alina Habba WENT OFF after the crooked New York City court slapped President Trump with an $83 million judgment for speaking out against the disgusting lies of a crazed woman who said he lured her into a Bergdorf Go...
Read more