Do You Believe A Word Of It?

 I listened to today's Congressional hearing about Trump's treason.  It featured Trump staffer after Trump staffer getting on the stand and swearing under oath that they told Trump every step of the way that his election fraud claims were utterly false.  


Great.  Of course, there is no real evidence besides their own claims that while it was happening, they did a damned thing to stand up to Trump.  


So we have a pack of known Republican liars, from Bill Barr on down, swearing that they told Trump the truth.  Why should we believe one word of what they are saying?  We know they have no respect for the truth, or the law, or anything else except their own survival.  These people willingly participated in the worst abuse of Presidential power in this country's history.  Now, they want to wriggle out of any responsibility for their treachery, through the simple means of lying before a Congressional committee, and claiming they were all so against Trump.  


Bullshit.  They were liars then, and I believe they are liars now.  It would be convenient if what they said were true, because it would show (one more time) what a corrupt liar Trump is, but I think they are desperate to save whatever tatters of reputation they have left, and avoid being destroyed by Trump's insanity, as so many have been before.  I don't believe a word of it.  Basically, I am afraid that all the committee did today was give a pack of Republican seditionists a public forum to run away from their treachery.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's Okay, Never Mind

Image
The woman in this picture, equipped with the weapons and ammunition shown, was found outside a National guard base. She is apparently a big Glenn Beck fan, and believed that the base was a FEMA concentration camp. Think she's the only one out there? You just know this sort of thing is not going to end well.
Read more

If a Tree Falls In the Woods

Image
 And nobody hears it, is it really running for President at all? First of all, a note about my absence lately:  My wife got me to sign up for an account at Threads, which is sort of like X without the assholes.  I've spent a little time establishing myself there, and I have to say, I do like the relatively immediate exchange of views, but I don't mean to give up my blog- there are still so many things that can't be dealt with in a couple hundred words, so, perhaps to your dismay, I am back. So, what motivated the above question is the fact that the Sunday New York Times today had seven articles about Trump, and absolutely zero about Kamala Harris.   The Republicans have a problem with Harris, in that virtually everyone who sees her likes her and immediately understands how qualified she is to be President.  They have tried mightily the last month to find some way to smear her, but have been spectacularly unsuccessful- the tactics of character assassination ...
Read more

Wingnuts Slightly Annoyed about that $83 Million

Image
How can you look like a decrepit old geezer and an out of control two year old at the same time? I thought it might be nice to look in on wingnut world to see how they are taking yesterday's $83 million dollar Trump legal loss.  You kind of know that they will decide it shouldn't affect their opinion of him in any way, but it might be helpful to see just how the Republican party has trained them to reject any fact they don't like.  Not that surprisingly, a lot of the usual wingnut suspects didn't touch this loss at all, preferring to just ignore anything that interferes with their hateful daydreams, but here are a few excerpts from an article at Gateway Pundit, along with a sample of the hundreds of comments it received.  Enjoy.  Or not. "Trump attorney Alina Habba WENT OFF after the crooked New York City court slapped President Trump with an $83 million judgment for speaking out against the disgusting lies of a crazed woman who said he lured her into a Bergdorf Go...
Read more