Right to Protect

A graphic posted by Jamie Galt, who was shot in the back yesterday by her four year old son.

Comments

Grung_e_Gene said…
What about the Gun's Rights?
March 10, 2016 at 5:46 PM
Magpie said…
Name is actually 'Gilt'.
We can assume it's pronounced 'guilt'.

She might have said 'My infantile presumption to treat my hobby as if it was anything other than just a hobby trumps any reasonable consideration of the possibility that my child might blow his own head off', except, y'know... 'freedom' and all that.

The first thought many normal people out in the world have when they read something like "Even my 4-year-old gets jacked up to target shoot the .22"...
is 'peasant tribal insurgents in fly-blown shitholes'
OR...
March 11, 2016 at 1:12 AM
Jerry Critter said…
It is not the gun I fear. It is your stupid, incompetent ass owning it that I fear.
March 11, 2016 at 8:55 AM
Green Eagle said…
Well, without the person, the gun is just going to lay there and do nothing. The problem seems to be that in "flyover country," there seems to be an unfortunately high correlation between owning a gun and being a stupid, incompetent ass.
March 14, 2016 at 7:11 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's Okay, Never Mind

Image
The woman in this picture, equipped with the weapons and ammunition shown, was found outside a National guard base. She is apparently a big Glenn Beck fan, and believed that the base was a FEMA concentration camp. Think she's the only one out there? You just know this sort of thing is not going to end well.
Read more

If a Tree Falls In the Woods

Image
 And nobody hears it, is it really running for President at all? First of all, a note about my absence lately:  My wife got me to sign up for an account at Threads, which is sort of like X without the assholes.  I've spent a little time establishing myself there, and I have to say, I do like the relatively immediate exchange of views, but I don't mean to give up my blog- there are still so many things that can't be dealt with in a couple hundred words, so, perhaps to your dismay, I am back. So, what motivated the above question is the fact that the Sunday New York Times today had seven articles about Trump, and absolutely zero about Kamala Harris.   The Republicans have a problem with Harris, in that virtually everyone who sees her likes her and immediately understands how qualified she is to be President.  They have tried mightily the last month to find some way to smear her, but have been spectacularly unsuccessful- the tactics of character assassination ...
Read more

Wingnuts Slightly Annoyed about that $83 Million

Image
How can you look like a decrepit old geezer and an out of control two year old at the same time? I thought it might be nice to look in on wingnut world to see how they are taking yesterday's $83 million dollar Trump legal loss.  You kind of know that they will decide it shouldn't affect their opinion of him in any way, but it might be helpful to see just how the Republican party has trained them to reject any fact they don't like.  Not that surprisingly, a lot of the usual wingnut suspects didn't touch this loss at all, preferring to just ignore anything that interferes with their hateful daydreams, but here are a few excerpts from an article at Gateway Pundit, along with a sample of the hundreds of comments it received.  Enjoy.  Or not. "Trump attorney Alina Habba WENT OFF after the crooked New York City court slapped President Trump with an $83 million judgment for speaking out against the disgusting lies of a crazed woman who said he lured her into a Bergdorf Go...
Read more