Just Wondering about that "Bullet"

Here's a photo from the AP of Donald Trump that was taken today, July 27, 2024.  Just to be clear, I saved this photo, took it into Photoshop and ran one iteration of the unsharp mask filter on it.


Look at the picture for yourself.  Do you see any damage whatsoever to his ear, let alone the sort of damage that would result from contact with a bullet from a high velocity assault rifle?  I don't want to sound like a conspiracy loon here, but come on...where is there a sign of the slightest damage whatsoever?


Something is really wrong here.

Comments

VoenixRising said…
They beamed him back up to the mothership and his entire human skinsuit was replaced. It's the only explanation.
One Fly said…
Agreed and what about the bullet picture?? Don't believe that for a second.
Anonymous said…
Am I the only person to notice that the "blood" splatter was entirely in the wrong direction for the claimed "bullet" strike? But it sure did look impressive when he stood up again, didn't it?
Buttermilk Sky said…
There was more damage to Evander Holyfield's ear when Mike Tyson bit him.
Mostly.A.Cynic said…
I know nothing about ballistics but a bullet from an AR 15 seems to me would have at least taken half of his ear off Just sayin'
LanceThruster said…
When speculation began almost immediately as to "which side" might be responsible, my first thought was that Trump’s "hit" would have to be a squib if they were trying to pull off a faked assassination, but that would mean the other victims were expendable. Every time there's security lapses and other anomalies, it's supposed to be reassuring to learn it was merely incompetence rather than conspiracy (like with 9/11).
LanceThruster said…
The bullet supposedly captured in flight seemed like such an oddly specific detail, yet I've heard nothing more about it since seeing it initially. Is it even possible to catch that streak without a super high speed camera, and would it have necessarily produced a streak on the image if it was indeed in the frame at the time of the photograph?
Green Eagle said…
Kaaviya, I have already seen a few memes with Trump's ear bleeding and Tyson leaning over Trump.
Anonymous said…
IMHO the whole "assassination" thing struck me as suspicious.

The Trump campaign was losing its edge. People were walking away in the middle of rallies. The news had given up live coverage and most reports only included a few highlights. Seemed like the campaign needed a reboot. Something to get them out of the doldrums. Something to flatter Trump and polish his image.

It might help to remember that Trump has had a significant history of dealings with an organization that had previously flattered him and was all about image, and spectacle: Professional wrestling. Presentations of a heroic front with blood smeared on the face for dramatic effect is a common pose in professional wrestling. The raised fist; the call to fight; the smear of blood were all straight out of WWF.

Then there are the oddities. How did the SS snipers chose a rooftop that left part of an easy place to shoot from partially shielded from their post by trees. But with an nu-obscured view of the podium? Story is that local law enforcement was supposed to guard that roof. Seems an odd thing to fail to double check.

Then there is the fact that the shooter was previously enthusiastically pro-Trump. Was he paid to shoot? By Trump? He killed a man in the stands. Something Trump hasn't commented on AFAIK. Accident. Or planned proof of danger. If true it is third-degree murder.

Shots are fired, SS does their thing. Someone drags a pop-bottle-top roughly over the ear or a theatrical blood packed is squirted in the appropriate place. Perhaps both. Whole thing takes two seconds. TFG puts on a brave and defiant act knowing he wasn't in danger.

Perhaps one or more SS agents were part of it. As I understand it the rule is then pile on and keep the principle covered until it is clear the danger has passed. Why was Trump allowed to pop up so quickly? How did they know there wasn't a second shooter? Even the first shooter could play dead and still pepper the area with rounds from the opposite side of the ridge line. Thirty round magazines are common.

Lots of questions. I'll add questions about why there is no scab or discoloration on the ear to the list. It seemed, at the time, to be too convenient, scripted, theatrical. So far, my doubts have not been laid to rest. I get the feeling that in a few years another shoe will drop.

Popular posts from this blog

It's Okay, Never Mind

Wingnuts Slightly Annoyed about that $83 Million

If a Tree Falls In the Woods