tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1903235483068862940.post6592518133764804271..comments2024-02-26T18:25:25.186-08:00Comments on Green Eagle: A Vietnam ReminderGreen Eaglehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13477132834757467690noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1903235483068862940.post-54432391569937224362017-06-02T13:39:16.398-07:002017-06-02T13:39:16.398-07:00" the United States stated that it "took..." the United States stated that it "took note" of the ceasefire agreements and declared that it would "refrain from the threat or use of force to disturb them."Green Eaglehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13477132834757467690noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1903235483068862940.post-41436872950915587812017-06-02T13:32:15.530-07:002017-06-02T13:32:15.530-07:00I agree with your point in general, but not the sp...I agree with your point in general, but not the specifics that we had a treaty obligation in those accords. <br /><br />I do not think we were signators to the agreement (although we did engage in the discussion, as it details). <br /><br />Also, no treaty, even if signed, becomes a legal obligation on the US until it is ratified. So to show that we had a legal obligation to honor it, you'd need to show the ratification vote date. <br /><br />I think your point is still correct, though. Just a bit oversold. Regards! <br /><br />Soflahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04329073847369441205noreply@blogger.com